rabbit anti mouse primary cd8 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Rabbit Anti Mouse Primary Cd8, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+primary+cd8/pmc12901995-227-18-24?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Agonistic CD40 elicits CD8+ T-cell-dependent primary responses and CD4+ T-cell-dependent long-term immunity in breast cancer"
Article Title: Agonistic CD40 elicits CD8+ T-cell-dependent primary responses and CD4+ T-cell-dependent long-term immunity in breast cancer
Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer
doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00889-7
Figure Legend Snippet: A Proportions of CD3+, CD8 +, and CD4 + T cells by flow cytometry in control and aCD40 treated Brpkp110 tumors on day 13 post treatment ( n = 10). B FoxP3 + CD4+ regulatory T cells on day 7 post-treatment ( n = 7). C Proportions of Granzyme B + T cells in subpopulations by flow cytometry in control and aCD40 treated Brpkp110 tumors on day 7 post implantation ( n = 10). D Images of immunofluorescent staining for CD8 (red) and nuclei (blue) and CD8 staining quantification in untreated (control) and aCD40 treated Brpkp110 tumors on day 7 post treatment ( n = 4–6). E Quantification of CD8 immunofluorescent staining in outer, middle, and inner thirds of control and aCD40 treated tumors on day 7 post treatment ( n = 5–6). F After 7 days of treatment with aCD40, Brpkp110 tumors were minced and cultured ex vivo. Supernatant was collected and pooled for each treatment group after 48 h and cytokines were measured ( n = 2, with 3 tumors pooled per group). G T cell activation and proliferation markers measured by flow cytometry in CD4+ and CD8 + T cell populations of control and aCD40 treated Brpkp110 TDLN on day 7 post-treatment ( n = 10). H Growth curves of control and aCD40 treated Brpkp110 tumors implanted into WT hosts with or without T cell depletions ( n = 17–20). I Tumor growth curve of aCD40 (treatment on Day 8) +/− FTY720 (treatment started on Day 7) treated Brpkp110 tumors ( n = 14–16). Data: ( A – C , D (right), E – G ) median, ( H , I ) mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Control, Staining, Cell Culture, Ex Vivo, Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A Tumor growth curves (left) and tumor volume changes compared to pretreatment on day 26 post implantation (right) of Brpkp110 tumors. Indicated treatments initiated on day 7 post implantation ( n = 18–20). B Tumor growth curves (left) and tumor volume changes compared to pretreatment on day 26 post implantation (right) of E0771 tumors. Indicated treatments initiated on day 8 post implantation ( n = 12–15). C Tumor growth curves (left) and tumor volume changes compared to pretreatment on day 31 post implantation (right) of AT3 tumors. Indicated treatments initiated on day 9 post implantation ( n = 14). D Tumor growth curves (left) and tumor volume changes compared to pretreatment on day 34 post implantation (right) of EpH4 1424 tumors. Indicated treatments initiated on day 5 post implantation ( n = 14–16). E Brpkp110 tumor growth curves (left) and volume changes compared to pretreatment (right) on day 27 post implantation in control and aCD40+ICB treated hosts with and without CD8 + T cell depletions. Indicated treatments initiated on day 7 post implantation ( n = 12–15). F Brpkp110 tumor growth curves (left) and volume changes compared to pretreatment (right) on day 25 post implantation in control and aCD40+ICB treated hosts with and without CD4 + T cell depletions. Indicated treatments initiated on day 8 post implantation ( n = 14–18). G Brpkp110 tumor growth curves (left) and volume changes compared to pretreatment (right) on day 27 post implantation in control and aCD40+ICB treated hosts with and without CD4+ and CD8 + T cell depletions. Indicated treatments initiated on day 7 post implantation ( n = 12–18). H Tumor growth curves (left) and volume changes compared to pretreatment (right) on day 26 post Brpkp110 tumor implantation into WT and BATF3 KO hosts. Indicated treatments initiated on day 7 post implantation ( n = 14–18). Data: ( A – H left) mean ± SEM, ( A – H right) each column represents individual tumor. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Control, Tumor Implantation
Figure Legend Snippet: A Proportions of circulating effector memory (CD44 + CD62L-), central memory (CD44 + CD62L+), and naïve (CD44-CD62L-) CD4+ (left) and CD8+ (right) in blood, 3 months post treatment induced tumor clearance ( n = 5–6, data representative of 2 experiments with similar results). B Secondary Brpkp110 tumor rechallenge of naïve and previously Brpkp110 tumor-bearing mice cured after aCD40 + ICB, at least 2 months post primary tumor clearance ( n = 12–14, data representative of 3 experiments with similar results). C Control and rechallenge tumor growth in T cell sufficient ( n = 6–12) and T cell depleted hosts ( n = 12–14, data representative of 2 experiments with similar results). D Brpkp110 tumor growth curves in intra-tumoral (IT) vehicle (control) and IT aCD40 treated hosts. aCD40 administered tumors denoted as aCD40 IT and contralateral untreated tumors denoted as CD40 IT Distant ( n = 9–12, data representative of 2 experiments with similar results). E Brpkp110 tumor growth curves in intra-tumoral (IT) vehicle (control) and IT or intraperitoneal (IP) aCD40 or ICB received hosts ( n = 4–9, data representative of 2 experiments with similar results). Data: ( A ) median, ( C – E ) mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Control

